No. There are written sources which are useful to us because they contain much of our sacred lore in the form of myths and examples of right conduct, but we do not accept them as infallible or inspired documents. Any religion which does this is deceiving its members about the purity and precision of the written word. The various competing factions of Middle Eastern religions are proof of this. Their conflicting interpretations can not all be correct!
There are two real sources of holy truth, and neither expresses itself to us in words. One is the universe around us, which is a manifestation of the underlying divine essence. The other is the universe within us, passed down from our ancestors as instinct, emotion, innate predispositions, and perhaps even racial memory. By combining these sources of internal and external wisdom with the literature left us by our ancestors, we arrive at religious truths. This living spiritual guidance is better than any dusty, dogmatic "holy book", whose writings are often so ambiguous that even clerical scholars disagree and whose interpretations change with the politics of the times.
Free eBooks (Can Be Downloaded):
Sirona Knight - The Cyber Spellbook Magick In The Virtual WorldLokamanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak - The Arctic Home In The Vedas
Reformed Druids - Anthology 03 Books Of The Liturgy
Lady Galadriel - The New Book Of The Law
Friedrich Max Muller - The Sacred Books Of The East
